Journal of African Development

ISSN (Print): 1060-6076
Editorial Policy
Peer Review Process
Reviewer Policy
Peer Review Process

All manuscripts undergo a double-blind peer review process to ensure impartiality and academic integrity.

 

Step-by-step Process:

  1. Initial Screening – The editorial office checks for scope, formatting, and plagiarism.

  2. Editorial Review – The Editor-in-Chief or a Section Editor evaluates the manuscript’s relevance and quality before sending it for peer review.

  3. Double-Blind Review – The manuscript is reviewed by at least two independent reviewers, who remain anonymous to the author, and vice versa.

  4. Review Timeframe – Reviewers are typically given 3–4 weeks to complete their evaluations.

  5. Decision Types – The final decision may be:

    • Accept

    • Minor Revision

    • Major Revision

    • Reject

  6. Revision – Authors must submit revised manuscripts within the specified timeframe along with a point-by-point response to reviewers.

  7. Final Decision – After satisfactory revisions, the manuscript undergoes a final editorial decision.

© Copyright Journal of African Development